IEN5001 Foundation in Strategy, Innovation and Management Critical Reflection Guide Assignment Help

SIEN5001
Foundation in Strategy, Innovation and Management
Critical Reflection Guide

IMPOTANT INFO
Due: 23:59 Thursday 6th June (Exam period)
ULOs assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6
Length: 1500 words (excluding references)
Weight: 25%
The task
For this assignment, you will synthesise knowledge and experiences gained over the semester by
reflecting on your learning and how it has contributed to your individual development as a future
manager, strategist and innovator.
Over the semester you have learned about and applied strategy tools in your case study report
and have worked in a team to develop, apply and evaluate a case organisation using an innovation
framework. You have also completed online modules with interactive activities and participated in
weekly workshops.
For this assignment, you will draw together what you have learned about your own managerial
mindsets as well as managing organisations and their innovations responsibly. This includes how you
have integrated ethical perspectives with your personal and professional values.
Identify ONE learning experience from the semester and critically reflect on how this contributed
to your development as a future manager and leader in the strategy and innovation space.
Subsequently, apply this learning experience to the Flourish FI case by critically assessing the
senior managers’ actions and providing your recommendations for handling a similar situation,
should you find yourself in their position.
Note: The case discussion questions (listed at the end of the case study) provide guidance on
what the main challenges are facing Flourish Fi. You do not have to answer these questions
separately but just consider them when applying your learning experience to critically assessing
the case study and thinking about recommendations to make.
The learning experience example should include:
• a learning experience where you discovered something about your personal
professional identity

You can use the 4Rs reflection framework outlined below to support your reflection, or another
model of your choosing.

Managerial reflection guide Page 2
Tips for writing your reflection:
Reflection is a crucial capacity for managers. This unit has emphasised the importance of reflection
and reflective practice as a key managerial skill. By purposively reflecting on active experiences,
you can consolidate knowledge and build understanding. Practising reflection and reflective writing
throughout the semester will assist you when you come to write your final reflection. Activities in the
weekly online modules and workshops are designed to support you with practising reflection
regularly.
Strong critical reflections will move beyond simple description of the learning experiences to analyse
how and why these experiences were impactful. To do this, you will need to apply relevant concepts
and tools from the unit into your reflection.
You can use the 4Rs reflection framework to support your reflection, or another model of your
choosing.
The 4Rs framework for reflective writing involves four key elements:
1. reporting and responding to a critical issue or experience,
2. relating this issue or experience to disciplinary knowledge in this field,
3. reasoning about causes and effects of the experience according to relevant theories
or tools, and,
4. reconstructing your thinking to plan new ways to engage in similar experiences in the
Future.
Level Stage Questions to get you started
1 Report (describe) the experience and
explain why it is important to your
professional practice. Give your initial
response to the experience or issue.

What happened? Why is it relevant? Respond
to the incident or issue by making
observations, expressing your opinion, or
asking questions.

2 Relate the experience to your own
discipline knowledge, skills, and
professional experience.

How does this connect to your knowledge of
the field or your professional/personal
experiences?

3 Reason about (discuss) the experience to
show an understanding of how it relates
to your knowledge of the discipline.

Which factors in the experience are important
for a new understanding? How do these
factors relate back to the concepts and tools
from the unit? What evidence can support
your claims?

4 Reconstruct your understanding for
future practice

What are the changes in your understanding
as a result of the experience and your
reflection upon it? What are the implications
of what you learned for your future
professional practice? What actions will you
take and why?

Source: this framework is based on Bain, Ballantyne, Mills & Lester (2002). The reporting and
responding stages in the 5Rs model have been combined in the model above to create 4Rs.

Managerial reflection guide Page 3
Format and style guide
Indicate SID and word count in the front page.
Reflective writing can be more personal in tone than a formal academic essay. It is appropriate to
use first person perspective. However, as a critical reflection your work must not be merely anecdotal,
your style should be analytic, and your claims supported by evidence.
There is no prescribed format for your report. However, you should structure your report clearly
and logically, including an introduction at the beginning and a conclusion at the end.
Avoid merely describing your experiences. Rather, demonstrate your understanding by applying
concepts and tools to your experiences within the unit.
You must provide appropriate referencing of any data sources or quotes, using a consistent
referencing style throughout the report. APA 7th style should be used.
Write in full sentences. Dot points are only for listing issues. You must still explain the issues. Do not
exceed the word limit. The top end of the word limit is the UPPER BOUND. Anything beyond that
will not be read. Present your ideas convincingly, creatively and concisely.

Managerial reflection guide Page 4
Assessment Rubric:

HD D C P F

Application of
disciplinary
knowledge

Critically identifies,
evaluates,
synthesises and
applies relevant
frameworks, tools
and concepts to
insightful examples.
Uses evidence to
support arguments.

Identifies,
evaluates,
synthesises and
applies relevant
frameworks, tools
and concepts to
good examples.
Uses evidence to
support
arguments.

Identifies,
evaluates and
applies relevant
frameworks,
tools and
concepts to
examples. Uses
evidence to
support
arguments.

Identifies and
applies relevant
frameworks,
tools and
concepts to
basic examples.
Uses evidence to
support
arguments.

Does not
demonstrate an
understanding
of disciplinary
knowledge,
tools or
concepts by
applying them
to examples.
Does not use
evidence to
support
arguments.

Reflexivity and
ethical
perspectives

Demonstrates
critical
selfreflexivity by
applying ethical
perspectives to
examples with a
high-level of
insight. Seamlessly
relates personal
and professional
identity to
challenging and
complex contexts.

Demonstrates
critical
selfreflexivity by
applying ethical
perspectives to
good examples.
Relates personal
and professional
identity to
challenging and
complex contexts.

Demonstrates
self-reflexivity by
applying ethical
perspectives to
examples.

Demonstrates a
basic level of
self-reflexivity
by applying
ethical
perspectives to
basic examples.

Does not
demonstrate any
self-reflexivity
and does not
apply ethical
perspectives to
examples.

Communication
style and form

Communicates
persuasively and
professionally to a
business audience
using well-honed
communication
and presentation
techniques. The
report is very
well-structured.
Referencing,
formatting,
grammar and
punctuation are to
a professional
standard.

Communicates
persuasively
and
professionally to
a business
audience using
appropriate
communication
and
presentation
techniques. The

report is well-
structured.

Referencing,
formatting,
grammar and
punctuation are
consistently
correct.

Communicates
clearly and
concisely to a
business
audience using
appropriate
communication
and
presentation
techniques.
The report is
appropriately
structured.
Referencing,
formatting,
grammar and
punctuation
are mostly
correct.

Communicates
soundly to a
business
audience using
appropriate
communication
and
presentation
techniques. The
report shows
some
consideration
for structure.
Referencing,
formatting,
grammar and
punctuation
contain errors.

Does not
communicate
persuasively
and
professionally.
Does not use
appropriate
communication
and
presentation
techniques.
The report is
poorly
structured.
Work is missing
or unclear.
Referencing,
formatting,
grammar and
punctuation are
incomplete or
poor.